HOSTHATCH 3T大盘鸡机是双核的吗。。。

We'r VPS 发布于 2020-04-07
分类：VPS交流
阅读(343)
评论(0)

HOSTHATCH 3T大盘鸡机是双核的吗。。。
开通有几天了一直以为是单核的。。。

贵州网友:多少钱一个月？
青海网友:3T只能年付84刀一年 7刀？
湖北网友:啥代码测试的，我买了一个伦敦的，我也去测试下
贵州网友:

(curl -s wget.racing/nench.sh | bash; curl -s wget.racing/nench.sh | bash) 2>&1 | tee nench.log
(wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash; wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash) 2>&1 | tee nench.log

复制代码

湖南网友:我是单核，买的伦敦鸡。
不过测试下载速度很快，大陆都有5M
上海网友:还行，能刷大馒头么？
海南网友:芝加哥电信联通比较快部分节点测速70M… 移动略惨实测到我本地杭州10M不到还不知道晚高峰会不会炸穿
北京网友:可以啊。。。不过性价比不是很高 PT刷热种还可以就是空间有点浪费了而且只有9T流量。不要搞BT离线缓存踩蜜罐基本就封机了血的教训
河南网友:我是说实际下载速度5M/S 不是MBPS的测试
广西网友:我是说实际下载速度5M/S 不是MBPS的测试
浙江网友:今天咋回事，我之前测试都有5M，刚才只有几十K，HOSTHATCH 不是在耍流氓吧，活动完就限速
安徽网友:1T的也是双核
新疆网友:速度没问题，只是伦敦路由不怎么稳…
辽宁网友:还有1T的？
湖南网友:
搞定了
山东网友:CPU性能怎么样，LZ测过unixbench没
黑龙江网友:嗯，那个季付12刀的1T的也是双核
北京网友:

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: localhost.localdomain: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Thu Nov 8 23:39:32 UTC 2018
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 [url=home.php?mod=space&uid=175]@[/url] 3.00GHz (6000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz (6000.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
10:13:12 up 4 days, 11:23, 2 users, load average: 0.22, 0.06, 0.06; runleve l 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 13 2019 10:13:12 – 10:41:14
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 36281974.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4547.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2693.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 559130.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 147939.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1685616.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 762413.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 167158.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 9354.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6184.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1297.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 732556.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 36281974.8 3109.0
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4547.6 826.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 2693.1 626.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 559130.4 1411.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 147939.4 893.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1685616.0 2906.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 762413.5 612.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 167158.1 417.9
Process Creation 126.0 9354.6 742.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6184.3 1458.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1297.5 2162.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 732556.7 488.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1046.7
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 13 2019 10:41:14 – 11:09:18
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 73517375.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9228.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 6128.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 973096.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 248798.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2874915.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1491338.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 344234.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20873.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9689.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1340.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1333281.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 73517375.3 6299.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9228.4 1677.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 6128.7 1425.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 973096.3 2457.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 248798.2 1503.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2874915.5 4956.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1491338.9 1198.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 344234.8 860.6
Process Creation 126.0 20873.6 1656.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9689.0 2285.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1340.7 2234.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1333281.5 888.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1894.7
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======