如同我的签名,我购买了他们的东西,因为我实在不懂他们老发我邮件里面的优惠是什么意思,所以今早下了一单,只是一个月的,先试试水,配置看上去非常便宜,但是不知道什么时候跑。配置如下:
CPU数:1
核数:6
逻辑CPU数:4
CPU型号:4 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz
ipv4数:3
价格:$4.99
不知道这个值不值得买(假如不算跑路风险),求大佬给个中肯的回答。不值得我就不续费了,值得我就弄一年的玩玩。
另外签名里面的aff是我头一次玩aff,纯属瞎弄,aff后有啥优惠我都不知道。
还有 small pool和普通vps有什么区别呢
北京网友:========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: pskhosting.regskynet.com: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-957.10.1.vz7.85.17 — #1 SMP Thu Apr 11 18:11:44 MSK 2019
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz (4200.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz (4200.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz (4200.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz (4200.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
23:40:33 up 1:07, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.04, 0.05; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Aug 06 2019 23:40:33 – 00:08:46
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26241698.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2877.4 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2004.5 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 338969.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 99231.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 912891.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 637102.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 93159.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 5192.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3675.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1294.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 633143.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26241698.9 2248.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2877.4 523.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 2004.5 466.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 338969.7 856.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 99231.9 599.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 912891.4 1574.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 637102.5 512.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 93159.7 232.9
Process Creation 126.0 5192.9 412.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3675.8 866.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1294.6 2157.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 633143.6 422.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 712.8
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 07 2019 00:08:46 – 00:37:04
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 93015820.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 10947.9 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 8328.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 491146.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 141405.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1378901.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2378792.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 402524.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 19378.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 11554.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1484.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2159349.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 93015820.3 7970.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 10947.9 1990.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 8328.7 1936.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 491146.5 1240.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 141405.8 854.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1378901.4 2377.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2378792.7 1912.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 402524.9 1006.3
Process Creation 126.0 19378.4 1538.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 11554.5 2725.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1484.4 2474.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2159349.0 1439.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1900.7
河南网友:签名都是这马甲商,怀疑是软文
河南网友:怀疑你都没看懂我说啥
北京网友:ovz都是共享的,不值得买
四川网友:有啥好买的 浪费精力
青海网友:楼主不用推这家aff了,论坛里基本都知道这家是alp的马甲。
一句话,不值得买。
广西网友: 一看就不值得。这家天天发垃圾邮件。
江西网友:
仅供参考
辽宁网友:天天发邮件,屏蔽了
青海网友:天天发邮件,屏蔽了
四川网友:我也知道是alp的,就是感觉挺便宜的,另外对硬件只是不是吃的很透,大佬们都说不值得,那我还是不要买了,另外alp也坑了我,当初我的网站可在上面,啥都没有留下,唉,另外aff那是不可能的,我发这个第一个目的是看看到老们感觉值得不,如果值得我就续费,也可以aff,如果不值得我肯定也不续费的。我的邮箱也是天天收到他家的邮件,今天顶不住好奇尝试一下看看到底是什么鬼。
未经允许不得转载:美国VPS_搬瓦工CN2 GIA VPS » apl完蛋后的pskhosting大家有买的吗